Apply Quality Control, Testing, and Troubleshooting Techniques
Red Seal Practice study guide with diagrams.
Applying Quality Control, Testing, and Troubleshooting Techniques
This chapter covers the essential skills of Red Seal competency block 11 for the Tool and Die Maker trade. You will learn dimensional verification methods, testing procedures, systematic troubleshooting techniques, and the application of relevant Canadian standards. Mastering these techniques is crucial: it distinguishes the machine operator from the qualified tool maker.
1. Fundamentals of Quality Control in Tool Making
1.1 Definitions and Principles
Quality control (QC) is a systematic process aimed at verifying that parts and tooling meet technical specifications. In tool making, these specifications are often expressed as tolerances — the allowable deviation between a nominal dimension and the actual measured dimension.
The three fundamental principles of QC in tool making are:
1.2 International System of Units (SI) and Tolerances
In Canada, the metric system is the legal standard, but the tool making industry frequently uses the imperial system (inches). The Red Seal exam requires mastery of both systems and their conversions.
| System | Base Unit | Common Sub-units | Equivalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Millimetre (mm) | 0.001 mm = 1 µm | 1 mm = 0.03937 in |
| Imperial | Inch (in) | 0.001 in = 1 mil | 1 in = 25.4 mm |
Quick conversion rule: to convert inches to millimetres, multiply by 25.4. To convert millimetres to inches, divide by 25.4. Example: 0.500 in × 25.4 = 12.70 mm.
1.3 Applicable Canadian Standards
Quality control in tool making relies on several national standards:
For the tooling itself, tolerances are generally defined according to ISO 286 classes (fit system). Common fits are:
2. Measuring Instruments and Their Use
2.1 Direct Measuring Instruments
The caliper: typical accuracy of 0.02 mm or 0.001 in. It measures outside dimensions, inside dimensions, and depths. Common pitfall: never use a caliper to measure a rotating part (risk of jaw wear).
The micrometre: accuracy of 0.001 mm (0.0001 in). It comes in outside, inside, and depth versions. Reading is done in three steps:
Reading example: Sleeve at 12.50 mm, thimble at 0.37 mm → total reading = 12.87 mm.
The dial indicator: used for comparative measurements (difference from a standard). Its typical resolution is 0.01 mm or 0.001 mm.
2.2 Optical and Electronic Measuring Instruments
2.3 Instrument Verification
Before each use, instruments must be verified against a reference standard. The reference temperature is 20 °C (68 °F). A temperature variation of 1 °C on a 100 mm steel part causes an expansion of approximately 0.0012 mm — a significant error for tolerances of 0.005 mm.
Verification procedure:
3. Dimensional Control Techniques
3.1 Measuring Geometric Characteristics
Geometric tolerances (GD&T) are governed by the ASME Y14.5 standard (adopted in Canada). The essential symbols are:
| Symbol | Characteristic | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| ⏤ | Straightness | The line must be straight within a given plane |
| ⏥ | Flatness | All points on the surface must lie within two parallel planes |
| ⭘ | Circularity | All points on the circumference must be equidistant from the centre |
| ⌭ | Concentricity | The centres of the circles must coincide |
| ⊥ | Perpendicularity | The surface or axis must be at 90° to a datum |
Specification example: ⏤ 0.005 A means the straightness of the surface must be within a zone of 0.005 mm relative to datum A.
3.2 Thread Measurement Methods
Threads are measured with thread gauges (go/no-go) or by the three-wire method. The three-wire method is the most accurate for measuring the pitch diameter.
Pitch diameter formula (for ISO metric threads):
Dp = M - 3 × (d_w) + 0.866 × P
Where:
Example: For an M12 × 1.75 thread with wires of 1.008 mm diameter, if M = 12.50 mm:
Dp = 12.50 - 3 × 1.008 + 0.866 × 1.75 = 12.50 - 3.024 + 1.516 = 10.992 mm
3.3 Surface Inspection
Surface roughness (Ra) is measured with a profilometer. Typical values for tool making are:
| Application | Ra (µm) | Ra (µin) |
|---|---|---|
| Roughing | 3.2 - 6.3 | 125 - 250 |
| Standard finishing | 0.8 - 1.6 | 32 - 63 |
| Precision finishing | 0.2 - 0.4 | 8 - 16 |
| Mirror polishing | < 0.1 | < 4 |
Common pitfall: Ra roughness does not provide information about the surface form (waviness, isolated peaks). A low Ra does not guarantee good sealing.
4. Tooling Testing
4.1 Functional Testing
Functional testing verifies that the tooling produces conforming parts under real operating conditions. The standard procedure is:
4.2 Hardness Testing
Hardness is an essential property of tooling. Common scales are:
| Scale | Indenter | Load | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell C (HRC) | Diamond cone | 150 kgf | Hardened steels |
| Rockwell B (HRB) | 1/16 in ball | 100 kgf | Mild steels |
| Brinell (HB) | 10 mm ball | 3000 kgf | Cast parts |
| Vickers (HV) | Diamond pyramid | Variable | Thin materials |
Approximate conversion rule: HRC ≈ (HV / 10) - 10. Example: HV 600 → HRC ≈ 50.
Common pitfall: never perform a hardness test on a cylindrical surface without proper support — the result will be inaccurate.
4.3 Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)
NDT methods detect internal defects without destroying the part. Common methods in tool making:
Regulatory requirement: NDT testing must be performed by personnel certified according to CSA W178.2 for welding. For non-welded tooling, certification is not mandatory, but competence is expected.
5. Systematic Troubleshooting
5.1 Problem-Solving Methodology
Troubleshooting in tool making follows a logical five-step approach:
5.2 Troubleshooting Blanking Dies
| Symptom | Probable Cause | Corrective Action |
|---|---|---|
| Excessive burr | Punch-die clearance too large | Reduce clearance or grind the edges |
| Material tearing | Clearance too small | Increase clearance or sharpen the edges |
| Premature wear | Insufficient lubrication | Improve the lubrication system |
| Broken punch | Misalignment | Check centring and guidance |
| Deformed part | Insufficient holding pressure | Increase the blank holder force |
5.3 Troubleshooting Injection Moulds
| Symptom | Probable Cause | Corrective Action |
|---|---|---|
| Part stuck on core | Insufficient draft | Increase the draft angle (1° to 3°) |
| Ejection marks | Ejection surface too small | Enlarge ejectors or add more |
| Weld line | Material temperature too low | Increase the barrel temperature |
| Sink mark | Insufficient holding pressure | Increase the pressure or hold time |
| Flash | Damaged parting line | Grind the parting line or check clamping force |
5.4 Troubleshooting Forming Tooling
Springback problem: the metal returns to its original shape after forming. Corrective actions are:
Springback compensation formula:
Corrected angle = Desired angle + (Desired angle × Springback factor)
The springback factor depends on the material: approximately 2% for mild steel, 5% for stainless steel, 10% for hardened aluminium.
6. Documentation and Traceability
6.1 Inspection Reports
Each inspection must be documented. The report must contain:
6.2 Certificates of Conformity
The certificate of conformity (C of C) attests that the tooling meets contractual specifications. It must be signed by an authorized person and accompanied by detailed inspection reports.
6.3 Non-Conformance Management
In the event of a non-conforming part, the standard procedure is:
7. Safety During Testing and Quality Control
7.1 Specific Hazards
7.2 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Summary
Pitfalls to Avoid
This chapter covers all the knowledge required for Red Seal competency block 11. Review the conversion tables, calculation formulas, and troubleshooting procedures — these are the elements most frequently tested on the exam.
Ready to test this chapter?
Practice with exam-aligned questions and timed simulations.
Start Practicing Free